Faecbook versus Livejournal
Oct. 21st, 2007 12:24 pmLast week,
siderea presented perspective on LJ versus facebook that generated some interesting discussion. This morning, I realized how I internally differentiate the two forums: LJ is more expository, Facebook is more conversational. Allow me to elaborate.
Facebook has what it refers to as "the wall" on which you can post comments and musings. The "feel" of the site tends to lend itself to the type of conversation that might arise at a cocktail party. This is a situation in which everyone knows who you are and anyone could be listening in on the discussion. For more intimate (in the social, sense) discussion, you can post those thoughts on another person's wall. As the name implies, wall-discussions are public, although you can send private messages directly to another person through the Inbox (Facebook-specific "mail"). Moreover, the small window provided for the wall seems to encourage brief musings, with little room for more than a couple of paragraphs. As a result, postings tend to be either briefly informative (speaking to the room) or brief forays into encouraging public discussion. Brevity is key, with little room to expound or wax poetic on a topic. The social nature of the system sets up a situation where social capital is important so what is written and how people respond serve not only to exchange information, but to set up a social exchange that resonates within the community you have built.
LJ, at least for me, feels more like a lecture hall. Many build a persona, providing a feel of protective distance between themselves and their audience. And it is an audience to which discussion is directed. The site has more of a feel of a person striding to the front of the room and stepping behind the lectern (in the case of more formal styles) or casually sitting on a desk (for a casual styles) to address a crowd of people who have chosen to attend you talk (by friending you) or who may be passing through (as in the case of lurkers). The interface seems to encourage long posts, through mechanisms such as the LJ cut. The relative anonymity of the audience members provides the opportunity for being somewhat more critical. The respondent can be less concerned with losing social capital; they can, after all, simply create a new account with a new persona if they wish.
In the end, I see both systems to be complementary, serving different functions. Facebook is the "going out for drinks after work"-type place where things are kept light and an attempt is made to feel enclosed in a warm (for the internet) environment. This is not the place for discussion on topics that are "too heavy", so to speak. LJ is the place to make a statement to the world; present your theories, tell your stories, create (as I do) the equivalent of a PowerPoint presentation of interesting things. As a result, it is the preferred location for those of us with a bent for lecturing.
In my brief foray into Facebook, I have found that it is a great place to meet people and keep tabs on those with whom I had previously lost contact. On the other hand, LJ is where I find the most interesting and engaging discussion, the types of things that encourage deep thought, discussion, and occasional argument. I may also be biased by having a friends list composed of intelligent and creative people.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Facebook has what it refers to as "the wall" on which you can post comments and musings. The "feel" of the site tends to lend itself to the type of conversation that might arise at a cocktail party. This is a situation in which everyone knows who you are and anyone could be listening in on the discussion. For more intimate (in the social, sense) discussion, you can post those thoughts on another person's wall. As the name implies, wall-discussions are public, although you can send private messages directly to another person through the Inbox (Facebook-specific "mail"). Moreover, the small window provided for the wall seems to encourage brief musings, with little room for more than a couple of paragraphs. As a result, postings tend to be either briefly informative (speaking to the room) or brief forays into encouraging public discussion. Brevity is key, with little room to expound or wax poetic on a topic. The social nature of the system sets up a situation where social capital is important so what is written and how people respond serve not only to exchange information, but to set up a social exchange that resonates within the community you have built.
LJ, at least for me, feels more like a lecture hall. Many build a persona, providing a feel of protective distance between themselves and their audience. And it is an audience to which discussion is directed. The site has more of a feel of a person striding to the front of the room and stepping behind the lectern (in the case of more formal styles) or casually sitting on a desk (for a casual styles) to address a crowd of people who have chosen to attend you talk (by friending you) or who may be passing through (as in the case of lurkers). The interface seems to encourage long posts, through mechanisms such as the LJ cut. The relative anonymity of the audience members provides the opportunity for being somewhat more critical. The respondent can be less concerned with losing social capital; they can, after all, simply create a new account with a new persona if they wish.
In the end, I see both systems to be complementary, serving different functions. Facebook is the "going out for drinks after work"-type place where things are kept light and an attempt is made to feel enclosed in a warm (for the internet) environment. This is not the place for discussion on topics that are "too heavy", so to speak. LJ is the place to make a statement to the world; present your theories, tell your stories, create (as I do) the equivalent of a PowerPoint presentation of interesting things. As a result, it is the preferred location for those of us with a bent for lecturing.
In my brief foray into Facebook, I have found that it is a great place to meet people and keep tabs on those with whom I had previously lost contact. On the other hand, LJ is where I find the most interesting and engaging discussion, the types of things that encourage deep thought, discussion, and occasional argument. I may also be biased by having a friends list composed of intelligent and creative people.